Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (Irssa)
In November 1996, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) released its final report of 4,000 references containing 440 recommendations. Indian residential schools have been the subject of a chapter.  In 1998, in response to the RCAP Gathering Strength: Canada`s Aboriginal Action Plan,:3 a “long-term” report, in response to the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, which contained the “Declaration of Reconciliation: Learning from the Past,” in which “the Government of Canada acknowledges and apologizes to those who have experienced physical and sexual abuse in Indian residential schools and who recognize their role in development and management. residential schools.”  Implementation of the Indian Schools Settlement Agreement began on September 19, 2007. The conciliation agreement represents the consensus reached between student legal advisors, church counsel, the Assembly of First Nations, other Aboriginal organizations and the Government of Canada. The implementation of this historic agreement provides a fair and lasting solution to the heritage of Indian residential schools. The law firm Regina, Saskatchewan Lawyer, Tony Merchant, Q.C. — Merchant Law Group LLP — represented more than 7,000 survivors — about 50 per cent of known residential school survivors in Canada who were pursuing class actions against the Canadian federal government.  Following the publication of the 1996 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples report, survivors of residential schools gathered across the country for meetings attended by Tony Merchant, who became a “familiar figure” and welcomed thousands of survivors for collective action.  MLG`s lawyers received “nothing until a class action was concluded” in a judicial agreement that was motivated by the liquidation.  David Blott`s law firm in Calgary, Alberta, “processed nearly 4,600 residential school applications.”  While the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRSSA) distributed large sums of money as compensation and helped residential school survivors recover, the system is also open to abuse.
For example, some former students who sought additional compensation through the Independent Assessment Process (IAP) were victims of unethical private lawyers who charged their clients a high fee in addition to the 15 per cent they received from the Canadian government. While the comparison stated that lawyers could calculate their clients by up to 15 per cent for difficult cases, many lawyers regularly calculated this percentage, while others charged inappropriate interest, fees and penalties. Chief Warrant Officer Dan Ish has opened an investigation into several private lawyers involved in the IAP, which has led in particular to a clearance and exclusion from the IRRSA. The conciliation agreement also provides $60 million for a five-year Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which would allow individuals, families and communities to share their experiences. The commission established in 2008 was ordered to make public through national events (z.B. Winnipeg in June 2010; Inuvik, NWT, in June 2011; Halifax in October 2011; Saskatoon in June 2012) and its support for regional and local activities. It would also create a “comprehensive historical record” on residential schools (and, on budget, a research centre). As of August 2012, the federal government had disclosed more than 941,000 documents to the TRC relating to residential schools.
Survivors across Canada began coming together in the mid-1980s and early 1990s to file a class action and seek compensation for abuse at a residential school. Survivors` groups have come together to support, heal and encourage legal action.